Every photograph published on Colourwise was individually reviewed on its own source page for licence, creator and reuse rights before publication — see methodology for the general approach and the sprint's image-sourcing policy for the full process. 73 photographs currently published.
Frame includes a standard Paris municipal street-name sign (public government signage, not a commercial trademark); no other identifiable branding is present.
Photograph of a museum-displayed ceramic object roughly 900 years old (Goryeo dynasty, Korea); the photographer — a prolific Commons museum-photography contributor — released their own photographic reproduction as CC0. No contemporary artist copyright applies to the object itself.
The original frame included distant, unidentifiable people in a background courtyard; the published image is cropped tightly to the brick wall only, removing them entirely before publication.
The uploader account name suggests a concrete-polishing business, but the photographed floor shows no logo, signage or readable branding — only a generic shipping hazard placard is faintly visible in the background.
A generic decorative maritime-themed print hangs on the wall — an unremarkable, non-identifiable decor print, not a recognisable named artwork.
A generic, traditional paisley pattern — not a distinctive named designer print.
The bracelet bears a historic Dutch hallmark ('J.H2' maker's mark, an oak-leaf 14-karat fineness mark, pre-1953) — a traditional assay/maker stamp, not a modern commercial trademark or logo.
A generic halo-setting design, not a distinctive named-designer piece.
A traditional floral engraving pattern, not a distinctive named-designer piece.
A small optical size/model code is printed inside one temple arm (standard industry sizing text, e.g. lens-bridge-temple measurements) — not a legible brand name.
Extreme macro crop of a single eye only — no other facial feature, hair, or identifying context is visible, so the individual is not identifiable from this image.
A single figure is visible in the blurred background, out of focus from camera motion — no face or other identifying feature is resolvable, so this was assessed as low risk rather than requiring rejection or a crop.