Short answer
Hue first, then depth: scarlet is the red that leans towards orange, crimson the red that leans towards blue, and crimson is usually the darker of the two. Their regions share only a narrow hue band (25°–28° in OKLCH), and the published values sit ΔE00 9.9–15.2 apart — a clearer split than most named pairs.
The lexicon places scarlet at hues 25°–38° and crimson at 12°–28°, and gives crimson a lightness range reaching lower (0.38–0.62 against 0.48–0.70). Only 20% of scarlet's sRGB colours are also crimson. The crowd survey adds the depth difference plainly: its crimson has OKLCH lightness 0.40, its scarlet 0.50. But the crowd's scarlet is itself a deep, slightly bluish red, and it falls inside Red, Scarlet, Crimson — it sits on the boundary rather than well inside scarlet. That is the usual pattern: people agree on the direction of the difference far more than on where any one swatch belongs.
Neither word started as a colour. Scarlet was a costly woollen cloth in medieval French and English, often but not always red; it is recorded as the name of a brilliant red from the late 14th century. Crimson came into English in the early 15th century, via Italian, from Arabic qirmizī — the kermes insect whose dye gave a deep purplish red — and at first also named the dyed cloth. Both were luxury textile words. Crimson's link to an insect dye that gave a purplish red is the likeliest source of its blue lean; the colour words kept their leans after the cloths were forgotten.
CSS defines crimson (#dc143c) but has no scarlet keyword; the catalogue's scarlet is #ff2400, a bright screen red close to the sRGB red primary. Both sit near the edge of what sRGB can show, with OKLCH chroma above 0.2, and on a wide-gamut phone both can look more intense than on an office monitor. What separates them on screen is hue, and at this saturation a hue difference of ten degrees is easy to see. On fabric and paint, where both are usually deeper than their screen versions, the difference in depth is often what people notice first.
Ceremonial and academic dress, sports colours and heraldry often name one of the two, and the institution's own reference, not the word, fixes the shade. For design work, the useful information is the lean: a scarlet brief wants a red that sits comfortably with oranges and warm neutrals; a crimson brief wants one that sits with pinks, purples and cool greys. Under lamps weak in deep red, both dull, and the balance between them can shift with the light, which is why red swatches are worth checking under the light they will be seen in.
| Scarlet | Crimson | Shared by both | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lightness (L) | 0.48–0.70 | 0.38–0.62 | 0.48–0.62 |
| Chroma (C) | 0.180–0.300 | 0.140–0.260 | 0.180–0.260 |
| Hue (h) | 25°–38° | 12°–28° | 25°–28° |
| Reference swatch | #ff2400 (L 0.64, C 0.248, h 31°) | #dc143c (L 0.57, C 0.222, h 20°) | ΔE00 15.2 apart |
| sRGB grid colours inside | 120 | 117 | 24 (20% of scarlet, 21% of crimson) |
| How settled the word is | moderate | moderate | — |
| Source of the value | Scarlet | Crimson | ΔE00 between them |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSS Color 4 named colour | no value published | #dc143c (L 0.57, C 0.222, h 20°) | — |
| Colourwise catalogue profile | #ff2400 (L 0.64, C 0.248, h 31°) | #dc143c (L 0.57, C 0.222, h 20°) | 15.2 |
| xkcd colour survey | #be0119 (L 0.50, C 0.205, h 26°) | #8c000f (L 0.40, C 0.164, h 26°) | 9.9 |
Why: The screen value sits at the orange-leaning, very light end; dyed scarlet on cloth is deeper.
Fix: Fix the red by a measured value per medium, and approve physical samples rather than screen previews.
Why: The hue difference between them is small in words but easy to see at high saturation.
Fix: Pick one lean for the whole set, or separate the two reds with a neutral.
Each statement is labelled by kind — established fact, a standard’s requirement, observed market data, a convention, or Colourwise’s own interpretation or analysis — with the strength of the evidence behind it.
Colourwise analysisModerate evidence
The xkcd survey's crimson (#8c000f) has an OKLCH lightness of 0.40 against 0.50 for its scarlet (#be0119), and the two are 9.9 apart in CIEDE2000.
Based on: OKLCH and CIEDE2000 computed by Colourwise from the published survey values.
Caveat: One crowd-sourced centre per name, gathered on uncalibrated screens.
Source: Color survey results, and the rgb.txt list of the 954 most common colour names
FactModerate evidence
Scarlet was first the name of a fine cloth, recorded as a colour name from the late 14th century; crimson came into English in the early 15th century from Arabic qirmizī, the kermes dye, via Italian.
Caveat: Summarised from a compiled etymology reference; dates are first recorded uses.
Source: Online Etymology Dictionary
StandardStrong evidence
CSS Color Level 4 defines crimson as #dc143c and has no scarlet keyword.
Source: CSS Color Module Level 4
Colourwise interpretationLimited evidence
Speakers agree more on the direction of the scarlet–crimson difference (orange-leaning versus blue-leaning, lighter versus deeper) than on where a given swatch belongs.
Based on: All sources put crimson at a bluer hue and lower lightness, yet the crowd's own scarlet falls inside the crimson region as well.
Caveat: Drawn from three published centres, not a study of individual naming.
Reviewed 29 September 2026. Colourwise summarises its sources in its own words and does not reproduce standards text or proprietary colour data. Spotted an error? Tell us.