Short answer
Print production is toleranced in layers, each with its own published figures: how far the approved sheet may sit from the aim values, how far the run may wander, how neutral the greys stay, and how close each spot colour is to its reference. The figures depend on the scheme. An ISO offset standard, Fogra's digital-printing bands and Idealliance's G7 checks use different statistics and patches, and a brand owner's own specification for its key colours usually sits on top of all of them.
A press run can go wrong in two independent ways: the approved sheet can be off target, or the run can drift away from the approved sheet. Print standards keep the two apart. The deviation tolerance compares the OK sheet with the aim values of the reference printing condition, and describes how well the press was set up. The variation tolerance describes how well it then held. In the offset standard, variation is judged against the OK sheet. Fogra's scheme for digital printing argues for judging it against the run's own average, on at least twenty randomly drawn samples, because a buyer cares about consistency across the delivery, and adds a requirement that at least 70 per cent of the sampled sheets also meet the deviation tolerances.
The tolerances on the four process solids are the best-known figures in printing, and their history is a caution against treating any tolerance as a constant of nature. The first edition of the offset process standard, in 1996, gave each ink its own ΔE*ab deviation tolerance, ranging from 4 to 8. The 2004 edition replaced them with 5 for all four. The 2013 edition added CIEDE2000 values for information: 3.5 for cyan, magenta and yellow and 5 for black. Researchers who tested these against 185 real jobs reported finding no published justification for any of the magnitudes, and found that the 2013 values pass the four inks at unequal rates. Their analysis suggested black did not need a wider limit than cyan and magenta.
Digital presses serve work ranging from colour-critical packaging to transactional mail, and Fogra's ProcessStandard Digital answers with three quality types instead of one limit: A, stringent, for colour-critical work; B, normal, for typical industrial printing; C, relaxed. For a side-by-side comparison with the reference, the average ΔE00 over a 72-patch control wedge must be below 2.5, 4.5 or 5.5 respectively, with a 95 per cent quantile below 4.5, 5.5 or 6.5. A second, wider set applies when the comparison is made media-relative, that is, relative to each paper's own white, which is allowed only after a check that the two gamuts are similar in size and shape. The handbook is explicit that the letters describe a level of match, not a better or worse product.
A total colour difference treats all errors alike, but a cast in the neutrals is what viewers notice first in a picture, so grey is checked separately in every scheme. The contract-proof standard tests a hue difference on a cyan, magenta and yellow overprint scale. Fogra's bands set a maximum chroma difference on the grey-balance patches, of 2.5, 3.5 or 4.5 for types A, B and C. The G7 method makes neutrality the centre of calibration: its system certification checks tone on black-only and three-colour grey scales as a weighted lightness error and grey balance as a weighted chroma error, each with an average below 1.5 and a maximum below 3. Further G7 levels add colour-difference limits on the solids and on a full characterisation target.
A brand colour printed as a spot ink is judged against its own reference, not against a printing condition. Published figures exist: the contract-proof standard allows 2.5 ΔE00 on spot-colour solids, and Fogra's digital bands set a maximum of 2.5, 3.5 or 5.5, with no media-relative option for spot colours and a recommendation to check first that the chosen press and substrate combination can reach the colour at all. In packaging the brand owner's specification normally governs, and its target increasingly travels as spectral data in the ISO spot-colour exchange format, which is valid only for the ink and substrate that were characterised. Substrate is the usual source of trouble: brightened board, film and foil shift the same ink differently, and a varnish or laminate shifts it again.
| Comparison | Standard or scheme | Method | Condition | Figure, as the source states it | Caveat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract proof against the characterisation data it simulates | ISO 12647-7:2016 (3rd edition) | ΔE00 on a control strip, with separate grey-balance and paper checks | Graphic-arts colorimetry: D50, 2° observer, 45°/0° geometry, ISO 13655 condition M1 | Paper and process solids 3.0; all patches average 2.5 and maximum 5.0; spot-colour solids 2.5 (all ΔE00) | Applies to a proof, not a press sheet. The standard itself says limits below 2.5 ΔE00 are impractical between instruments of different models. |
| Offset press sheet (the OK sheet) against the aim values for the solids | ISO 12647-2:2013 (3rd edition), as described by Yu, Chung and Myers (2015) | ΔE*ab as the tolerance metric, with ΔE00 values given for information | Graphic-arts colorimetry: D50, 2° observer, 45°/0° geometry | Informative ΔE00 deviation tolerances for the solids: cyan, magenta and yellow 3.5, black 5. The 2004 edition used 5 ΔE*ab for all four solids. | The ΔE00 values are informative, not normative, and are quoted from a conference paper's account of the standard. The paper found no published justification for the magnitudes. |
| Digital production print (OK sheet) against the reference printing condition, side by side | Fogra ProcessStandard Digital Handbook 2025 (tolerance set 'PSD 2022') | ΔE00 over the Fogra MediaWedge V3.0, plus chroma difference ΔCh on grey-balance patches | Graphic-arts colorimetry on the 72-patch control wedge | Average ΔE00 below 2.5 (A), 4.5 (B), 5.5 (C); 95 % quantile below 4.5, 5.5, 6.5; substrate below 3.5; grey balance ΔCh at most 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 | Fogra's certification scheme for digital printing, not an ISO requirement, and limited to the control wedge. A separate, wider set applies to media-relative evaluation. |
| Stability within one digital print run | Fogra ProcessStandard Digital Handbook 2025 (tolerance set 'PSD 2022') | ΔE00 between each of at least 20 randomly drawn samples and the average of those samples | Primary and secondary solids and the 40–50 % midtones of the primaries; 95 % quantile | 95 % quantile ΔE00 below 1.5 (A), 3.5 (B), 5.5 (C) | A within-run limit: it says nothing about whether the run as a whole is on target, which the deviation tolerance covers. |
| Neutral tone and grey balance of a calibrated printing system (G7 system certification) | Idealliance G7 System Certification validation process (application data sheet for ChromaChecker 2020.0) | Weighted ΔL* on K-only and CMY-only scales; weighted ΔCh on the CMY-only scale | P2P target grey scales measured after the calibration curves are applied | Weighted ΔL* average below 1.5 and maximum below 3; weighted ΔCh average below 1.5 and maximum below 3 | These certify a calibration system. G7 Targeted and G7 Colorspace compliance add colour-difference limits on solids and on a full target, whose values were not verified here. |
| Spot (brand) colour reproduced in digital production printing | Fogra ProcessStandard Digital Handbook 2025 (tolerance set 'PSD 2022') | Maximum ΔE00 against the spot colour's reference | Side-by-side evaluation only; no media-relative evaluation for spot colours | Maximum ΔE00 below 2.5 (A), 3.5 (B), 5.5 (C) | A scheme for digital print. A brand owner's own specification usually overrides it and is often tighter for its key colours. |
| Spot-colour ink specified to a converter or printer | ISO 17972-4:2018 (CxF/X-4), 2nd edition, confirmed 2023 | Spectral reflectance target with a colour-difference limit chosen by the brand owner | Spectral data for the ink on the characterised paper-like substrate; valid only for that ink and substrate combination | None verified; agreed by the parties | The format carries the target, not the tolerance; the limit and its formula still have to be written into the supply agreement. |
Why: Only the deviation tolerance was checked; the run drifted after sign-off.
Fix: Sample the run, and report variation against a stated reference as a separate result.
Why: Grey balance has drifted while each ink stayed inside its own limit.
Fix: Measure the grey-balance patches and correct tone curves; do not chase solid densities.
Why: The substrate or finish differs, and the spectral target was characterised on only one.
Fix: Hold a target and tolerance per substrate and finish, and measure after varnishing or laminating.
Each statement is labelled by kind — established fact, a standard’s requirement, observed market data, a convention, or Colourwise’s own interpretation or analysis — with the strength of the evidence behind it.
StandardModerate evidence
The 2013 edition of ISO 12647-2 includes informative ΔE00 deviation tolerances for the process solids of 3.5 for cyan, magenta and yellow and 5 for black; the 2004 edition used 5 ΔE*ab for all four solids, and the 1996 edition used a different ΔE*ab value for each.
Caveat: Taken from a conference paper's account of the three editions; the ΔE00 values are informative, not normative.
Source: An Investigation of Factors Influencing Color Tolerances; ISO 12647-2:2013 Graphic technology — Process control … — Part 2: Offset lithographic processes
FactModerate evidence
A study of 185 jobs in Fogra's Process Standard Offset database found no published justification for the magnitudes of the ISO 12647-2 solid tolerances and found that the 2013 ΔE00 values pass the four inks at unequal rates.
Measured: 185 offset print jobs in the Fogra PSO database.
Caveat: One conference paper using one certification database.
Source: An Investigation of Factors Influencing Color Tolerances
StandardStrong evidence
For side-by-side evaluation, Fogra's ProcessStandard Digital requires an average ΔE00 over the MediaWedge below 2.5, 4.5 or 5.5 and a 95 % quantile below 4.5, 5.5 or 6.5 for quality types A, B and C, with a substrate difference below 3.5 for all three.
Caveat: A Fogra certification scheme for digital printing, communicated as 'PSD 2022'; not an ISO requirement and not applicable to other processes.
Source: ProcessStandard Digital Handbook 2025: Step by Step toward Printing the Expected
StandardStrong evidence
Fogra's ProcessStandard Digital judges variation within a run on at least 20 randomly selected samples against their own average, with a 95 % quantile ΔE00 below 1.5, 3.5 or 5.5 for types A, B and C, and requires at least 70 % of the sampled sheets to meet the deviation tolerances.
Source: ProcessStandard Digital Handbook 2025: Step by Step toward Printing the Expected
StandardModerate evidence· North America
Idealliance's validation process for G7 system certification requires weighted ΔL* on the black-only and three-colour grey scales, and weighted ΔCh on the three-colour scale, each to average below 1.5 with a maximum below 3.
Caveat: Tolerances for certifying a calibration system, reproduced in a vendor's application data sheet; print-job compliance levels have their own requirements.
Source: G7 System Certification Application Data Sheet (ChromaChecker 2020.0)
StandardStrong evidence
Fogra's ProcessStandard Digital sets a maximum ΔE00 for spot colours of 2.5, 3.5 or 5.5 for quality types A, B and C and provides no media-relative evaluation for spot colours; ISO 12647-7:2016 allows 2.5 ΔE00 on spot-colour solids in contract proofs.
Source: ProcessStandard Digital Handbook 2025: Step by Step toward Printing the Expected; ISO 12647-7:2016 … — Part 7: Proofing processes working directly from digital data
FactModerate evidence
G7 compliance is defined at three levels, G7 Grayscale, G7 Targeted and G7 Colorspace, each adding requirements to the one before: solids and overprints against a reference print condition, then a full characterisation target.
Caveat: From an instrument maker's summary of the 2018 Idealliance pass/fail document.
Source: New G7 Pass/Fail Requirements
Reviewed 6 October 2026. Colourwise summarises its sources in its own words and does not reproduce standards text or proprietary colour data. Spotted an error? Tell us.